done my remap

by **AE_Ibiza** » Fri Aug 07, 2015 12:15 pm

About AFR, from standard value between 300/450 mg/st I have 13 to 15...is it better to put this values near 17 or I can just leave it as they are?

by **muder** » Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:18 am

Hi,
try to tune whole map to AFR 16,5-17, it will be better for performance and almost smokeless.

by **AE_Ibiza** » Sat Aug 08, 2015 11:28 am

muder wrote:Hi,
try to tune whole map to AFR 16,5-17, it will be better for performance and almost smokeless.

thanks muder, you have been very helpful!

by **AE_Ibiza** » Sat Aug 08, 2015 12:27 pm

so, for the sake of it...
see the attach, only the smoke limiter map, see the awkward shape but I can manage to stay within 1:17 AFR!
will this do the work or is it so stupid that doesn't even deserve a response?

by **muder** » Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:18 pm

Hi,
probably due to my language limitations ( i`m not a native English ;) ) small misunderstanding occured. My apologies. Of course, in basic tuning - if you recalculate to 16,5-17 AFR only 2 last columns, will be enough.

by **AE_Ibiza** » Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:28 pm

muder wrote:Hi,
probably due to my language limitations ( i`m not a native English ;) ) small misunderstanding occured. My apologies. Of course, in basic tuning - if you recalculate to 16,5-17 AFR only 2 last columns, will be enough.

not at all! I understand, this was just a question nothing more...
that's why I said to only look into the smoke limiter map, looks odd but it performs like it should

by **AE_Ibiza** » Sun Aug 09, 2015 9:47 pm

AE_Ibiza wrote:
muder wrote:Hi,
probably due to my language limitations ( i`m not a native English ;) ) small misunderstanding occured. My apologies. Of course, in basic tuning - if you recalculate to 16,5-17 AFR only 2 last columns, will be enough.

not at all! I understand, this was just a question nothing more...
that's why I said to only look into the smoke limiter map, looks odd but it performs like it should

forgot to mention!

other thing, and this I have some dificulty to understand.
N75 map, I'm afraid of using the "original" just because of the look of it (some "holes"), but, the N75 map that I'm using now creates some gap. I mean when I put the foot in the throtle it takes some time to respond...
can you give some advice?

by **muder** » Sun Aug 09, 2015 10:47 pm

you shouldn`t "just like that" changing N75 maps, because it`s calibration map for turbo.
So, change back map to ori ( don`t worry about "holes"), do logs (vcds group 011), look up for boost spikes and regulate it.

by **muder** » Sun Aug 09, 2015 11:06 pm

And..you have a poor response from throttle, because on that map, turbo vanes are open too much and turbo spools up slowly.

by **AE_Ibiza** » Mon Aug 10, 2015 12:17 am

muder wrote:And..you have a poor response from throttle, because on that map, turbo vanes are open too much and turbo spools up slowly.

I will back my n75 map to the original, do like you said, log on group 011.
For what I can understand, and is not much, I should have values higher than the ones I have. I use vagedcsuite I read in percentage and as far as I understand if I have 76% it means its almost close.
.?
But in your coment you refer vanes too open...you refer on low revs?
Other thing, it's not to powerful and it creates some lag...but it turns the car much more fun!!
Thanks for everything you have been trully helpfull