Rate my Tune pls AUDI A3 2.0 tdi gtb 2260. no cat no egr.

by **FATIBO** » Mon Jun 12, 2017 5:57 pm

I got new gtb2260 turbo with Downpipe. I made some mod..
Is this a good tune?

by **FATIBO** » Mon Jun 12, 2017 6:29 pm

Ori. file.

by **FATIBO** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:04 pm

Can someone with much of expirience rate my tune? Please?

by **Houdini** » Sat Jun 17, 2017 8:25 pm

i do not agree with this map you are wasting allot of boost, you need more fuel, with this Iq you are using you won't need 2.8 mbar absolute. your maps are not 100 correct. you have up to 75/73 mg of fuel in nm to iq, duration is set up for 80 mg of fuel smoke limiter to 72. with that iq you only need 2.5/2.6 mbar of boost. your svbl is also wrong. it should be the highest limiter. for me this map can be done allot better. i would see some boost logs as well because the n75 will need allot of work done.

by **Kreiser** » Wed Jun 21, 2017 11:00 pm

Houdini wrote:i do not agree with this map you are wasting allot of boost, you need more fuel, with this Iq you are using you won't need 2.8 mbar absolute. your maps are not 100 correct. you have up to 75/73 mg of fuel in nm to iq, duration is set up for 80 mg of fuel smoke limiter to 72. with that iq you only need 2.5/2.6 mbar of boost. your svbl is also wrong. it should be the highest limiter. for me this map can be done allot better. i would see some boost logs as well because the n75 will need allot of work done.

2800/2.026/17=81.3 mg safety) its enough to be very strong 2.0diesel) but he can't calculate and set afr to 15.8... great decision)

by **WOTLOGIX** » Thu Jun 22, 2017 7:18 am

Kreiser wrote:
Houdini wrote:i do not agree with this map you are wasting allot of boost, you need more fuel, with this Iq you are using you won't need 2.8 mbar absolute. your maps are not 100 correct. you have up to 75/73 mg of fuel in nm to iq, duration is set up for 80 mg of fuel smoke limiter to 72. with that iq you only need 2.5/2.6 mbar of boost. your svbl is also wrong. it should be the highest limiter. for me this map can be done allot better. i would see some boost logs as well because the n75 will need allot of work done.

2800/2.026/17=81.3 mg safety) its enough to be very strong 2.0diesel) but he can't calculate and set afr to 15.8... great decision)

maybe if you look at the map he posted properly you will see that his nm to iq is not correct. if you know anything about tuning you will know that you will never get your max IQ at 4000 rpm. that is where he has got his "81 mg of fuel" his nm to iq table should be extended further so that he has the 81 mg of fuel at lower rpm than 4000. which means his torque limiter will also change. he is asking for 450 nm in torque limiter from 2000 rpm till 3800 rpm which he will get way less iq than 81 mg of fuel between 2000- 3800 rpm.
so please look at his map properly before trying to make stupid comments.

by **Kreiser** » Thu Jun 22, 2017 9:21 am

WOTLOGIX wrote:
Kreiser wrote:
Houdini wrote:i do not agree with this map you are wasting allot of boost, you need more fuel, with this Iq you are using you won't need 2.8 mbar absolute. your maps are not 100 correct. you have up to 75/73 mg of fuel in nm to iq, duration is set up for 80 mg of fuel smoke limiter to 72. with that iq you only need 2.5/2.6 mbar of boost. your svbl is also wrong. it should be the highest limiter. for me this map can be done allot better. i would see some boost logs as well because the n75 will need allot of work done.

2800/2.026/17=81.3 mg safety) its enough to be very strong 2.0diesel) but he can't calculate and set afr to 15.8... great decision)

maybe if you look at the map he posted properly you will see that his nm to iq is not correct. if you know anything about tuning you will know that you will never get your max IQ at 4000 rpm. that is where he has got his "81 mg of fuel" his nm to iq table should be extended further so that he has the 81 mg of fuel at lower rpm than 4000. which means his torque limiter will also change. he is asking for 450 nm in torque limiter from 2000 rpm till 3800 rpm which he will get way less iq than 81 mg of fuel between 2000- 3800 rpm.
so please look at his map properly before trying to make stupid comments.

lol. no need in Ur comment. because no need to explain me this.I was talking about his turbo map. and U try to learn me. I was talking just about turbo and what he can get. not about his mod in common.
Regards.

by **WOTLOGIX** » Thu Jun 22, 2017 11:05 am

why would you comment crap on my post if you didn't check his tuned file to see what iq he actually gets before commenting crap on my post. if people say they used 81 mg/s you need to check in their actual file. that is why i said he is wasting boost because of the actual iq he is getting. so before you comment get your info straight before you make assumptions . cheerz